all girled up...
safeword:

WOW THIS IS SO LITERALLY ME WOW THIS IS LITERALLY ME AND MY GLASSES AND MY JEWISH NERVOUSNESS AND MY SEEING ALL SIDES OF EVERY ARGUMENT AND AGREEING WITH EVERYONE AND THEN PEOPLE GET MAD WOW THIS IS SO HARDCORE ME

My Mistress recently described me as a cross between Woody Allen and Eddie Izzard - the neurosis plus the crossdressing plus the spontaneous spouting of random historical trivia but hopefully minus the “marrying the teenage stepdaughter” part… and hopefully including the part about just being funny.

safeword:

WOW THIS IS SO LITERALLY ME WOW THIS IS LITERALLY ME AND MY GLASSES AND MY JEWISH NERVOUSNESS AND MY SEEING ALL SIDES OF EVERY ARGUMENT AND AGREEING WITH EVERYONE AND THEN PEOPLE GET MAD WOW THIS IS SO HARDCORE ME

My Mistress recently described me as a cross between Woody Allen and Eddie Izzard - the neurosis plus the crossdressing plus the spontaneous spouting of random historical trivia but hopefully minus the “marrying the teenage stepdaughter” part… and hopefully including the part about just being funny.

People answer hundred of questions on sites like OKCupid just to find that one person whose tastes match theirs exactly. Then they do a search and find only one person who’s satisfactory - and it turns out it’s themselves. The best parts of a relationship involve introducing each other to new things, not reciting in unison every line of all the favorite movies you share. When I find a 98% match on OKC whose lists all coincide with mine, I’m not excited, I’m leery. I want to learn new things from whomever I’m with, not dwell on shared tastes that only become stale over time.

People answer hundred of questions on sites like OKCupid just to find that one person whose tastes match theirs exactly. Then they do a search and find only one person who’s satisfactory - and it turns out it’s themselves. The best parts of a relationship involve introducing each other to new things, not reciting in unison every line of all the favorite movies you share. When I find a 98% match on OKC whose lists all coincide with mine, I’m not excited, I’m leery. I want to learn new things from whomever I’m with, not dwell on shared tastes that only become stale over time.

alicejaneannconnolly:

All things must change to something new, to something strange.

~ Henry Wadsworth Longfellow (1807 - 1882)

I feel like I’m undergoing that sort of change as we speak…

ezrapound:

hahahahahahahh truth.

ezrapound:

hahahahahahahh truth.

Harvard’s Hasty Pudding: A Cross-Dressing Tradition

Harvard University is known for its high academic standards, but correspondent Mo Rocca examines one of the Ivy League school’s most hallowed traditions: The Annual Hasty Pudding Show, a theatrical extravaganza where men are men, and women are … also men

Harvard University is known for its high academic standards, but correspondent Mo Rocca examines one of the Ivy League school’s most hallowed traditions: The Annual Hasty Pudding Show, a theatrical extravaganza where men are men, and women are… also men…

thepeacockangel:

Dick Dale - Miserlou

King of surf guitar indeed.

thisrabbitsgonemad:

I honestly hate it when people make their sex life completely open. They’ll just throw it out randomly or say who they’ve had sex with, how many times, when, where, what else they’ve done and talk about it in person or post it up on the internet. I don’t care if its with your boyfriend or someone random, you look like a slut. … It’s all stupid. It’s all for show if you go around telling people. It’s stupid. Stop being slutty.

And I honestly hate it when people make a big show about how holier than thou they are about their own so-called spiritual life, making their religious beliefs and attitudes about sex completely open and sharing their ignorant narrowminded Sunday school views about how other people SHOULD behave with the rest of us. They’ll just throw it out randomly and knock other people who’ve had sex when they haven’t ever done it themselves because of their frigging religious hypocrisy. I don’t care if it’s invoking Jesus or Mohammed or Cthulhu or some random god, you look like a stupid ignorant hick. Probably because that’s what you are. It’s all stupid. It’s all for show if you go around telling people how they should behave. It’s stupid. Stop being a self-righteous prick.

So I decided to become a midwife… I wanted to deliver a thousand babies. And as each one arrives, especially the little girls, I’ll be there first to whisper into her tender little ear: REBEL! REBEL!
Emma Goldman (via fuckyeahanarchism)

Is that where David Bowie got the idea for the song? … Oh, she meant the verb! Still…

exile-on-izzy-street:

religiousragings:

yvanckatron:

religiousragings:

Couldn’t figure out murder is wrong by yourself, huh?

Even if the world was devoid of religion, morality would still be subjective on the individual level. It would be grossly skewed from individual to individual and culture to culture because we all have different perceptions and interpretations of physical reality. If you are an atheist and you believe that religion is simply a tool of social control consider this: what would be the state of our world today if no religions had ever existed? Please, honestly and thoroughly think about it for a minute or two.

Let’s see…
Without religious dogma to fall back on, the ignorant would have had very little to support their hatreds.  The smartest people of their time, the philosophers, would likely have dominated, because their philosophies and such could be proven to work.  Secular ethics would likely have become dominant, much, much earlier.
And without religion, we would not have had any reason to believe that we knew anything about the world except by studying it.  So the scientific method may have been discovered and universally applied perhaps 5000 years earlier than it did.  Which means that we would have had our current explosion in technology perhaps 4500 years ago.
Without the delay caused by religion, we may have recognized population problems before they occurred, and without religion constantly pushing people to have more children, the world’s population may have leveled off somewhere around 3 or 4 billion.
So, less starvation, less war over limited resources, no war over religious differences, no crusades, far fewer genocides, less health problems caused by over population, consequently less pollution.  Perhaps more time to recognize global warming before it occurred, and less opposition to the science that recognizes it and suggests changes.
And without religion, people would have likely spent tithings on charities instead, again more quickly putting an end to world misery.
Sooo…there still would have been wars, mindless death and destruction, atomic weapons, arms races, and dictators.  But I would think that after 5000 years science would have found ways to deal with mental illness and come up with better foods and better, cleaner energy alternatives than fossil fuels.  The driving motivation behind wars would thus diminish, and perhaps after 5000 years they would be looked upon as an aspect of humanities infancy.
And thus of course, without religion the computer singularity would have happened millennia ago, and artificial intelligence might have been a massive help to solving all of the world’s remaining problems.
Where would we be right now?  Hard to say, but I would hazard to guess that we’d have colonies around several nearby stars at the very least.
So, yeah.  This is about as honest as thorough as I can make it on short notice.
Of course, I do have to acknowledge that we never would have had the wisdom of a 2000 year old book telling us not to eat shellfish.  But some sacrifices would have to be made.
~ Steve

 ^A++ response

exile-on-izzy-street:

religiousragings:

yvanckatron:

religiousragings:

Couldn’t figure out murder is wrong by yourself, huh?

Even if the world was devoid of religion, morality would still be subjective on the individual level. It would be grossly skewed from individual to individual and culture to culture because we all have different perceptions and interpretations of physical reality. If you are an atheist and you believe that religion is simply a tool of social control consider this: what would be the state of our world today if no religions had ever existed? Please, honestly and thoroughly think about it for a minute or two.

Let’s see…

Without religious dogma to fall back on, the ignorant would have had very little to support their hatreds.  The smartest people of their time, the philosophers, would likely have dominated, because their philosophies and such could be proven to work.  Secular ethics would likely have become dominant, much, much earlier.

And without religion, we would not have had any reason to believe that we knew anything about the world except by studying it.  So the scientific method may have been discovered and universally applied perhaps 5000 years earlier than it did.  Which means that we would have had our current explosion in technology perhaps 4500 years ago.

Without the delay caused by religion, we may have recognized population problems before they occurred, and without religion constantly pushing people to have more children, the world’s population may have leveled off somewhere around 3 or 4 billion.

So, less starvation, less war over limited resources, no war over religious differences, no crusades, far fewer genocides, less health problems caused by over population, consequently less pollution.  Perhaps more time to recognize global warming before it occurred, and less opposition to the science that recognizes it and suggests changes.

And without religion, people would have likely spent tithings on charities instead, again more quickly putting an end to world misery.

Sooo…there still would have been wars, mindless death and destruction, atomic weapons, arms races, and dictators.  But I would think that after 5000 years science would have found ways to deal with mental illness and come up with better foods and better, cleaner energy alternatives than fossil fuels.  The driving motivation behind wars would thus diminish, and perhaps after 5000 years they would be looked upon as an aspect of humanities infancy.

And thus of course, without religion the computer singularity would have happened millennia ago, and artificial intelligence might have been a massive help to solving all of the world’s remaining problems.

Where would we be right now?  Hard to say, but I would hazard to guess that we’d have colonies around several nearby stars at the very least.

So, yeah.  This is about as honest as thorough as I can make it on short notice.

Of course, I do have to acknowledge that we never would have had the wisdom of a 2000 year old book telling us not to eat shellfish.  But some sacrifices would have to be made.

~ Steve

 ^A++ response